How to choose a 401(k) software development partner
Ten checks and the questions to ask before you hire a team to build retirement plan software.
Read moreBuy the core when your workflows are standard and a vendor already keeps up with rule changes. Build when the process is what sets your firm apart, when no product fits your data flows, or when re-keying between tools costs more than development. Most TPAs and recordkeepers do both: buy the core, build around it.
Keep a proven core for testing or recordkeeping, and build the pieces around it that the product does not do well: data intake and validation, integrations, owner dashboards, billing and sponsor portals. This removes most re-keying without taking on the whole rule book.
| Buy | Build | Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first use | Fastest | Slowest | Fast for the core, then incremental |
| Fit to your process | You adapt to the product | Exact | Exact where it matters |
| Rule updates | Vendor | You or your developer | Mostly vendor |
| Data hosting control | Vendor's model | Yours | Mixed |
| Re-keying between tools | Often remains | Removed | Mostly removed |
For independent TPAs there is also a middle path we built ourselves: KinetiPlan, a TPA operating system that can be hosted in the TPA's own environment. It is a working pilot build.
Software Home builds custom 401(k) software, so we have an interest in this question. We have tried to set out both sides fairly. See TPA software development or talk to us.
Ten checks and the questions to ask before you hire a team to build retirement plan software.
Read moreReplacing spreadsheets and legacy plan systems with parallel runs and reconciled balances.
Read morePlan administration systems for US third-party administrators: plan years, census, testing, 5500 data and billing.
Read moreA TPA operating system we built for independent US retirement plan administrators: compliance testing, recordkeeping ledger, payroll intake, projects and billing in one place.