Guide

Build vs buy: software for 401(k) TPAs and recordkeepers

When an off-the-shelf product is enough, when custom software pays off, and the hybrid most firms end up with.

Home / Guides / Guide

Short answer

Buy the core when your workflows are standard and a vendor already keeps up with rule changes. Build when the process is what sets your firm apart, when no product fits your data flows, or when re-keying between tools costs more than development. Most TPAs and recordkeepers do both: buy the core, build around it.

When buying is the right call

  • Your plan types and workflows are standard.
  • You have a small team and no appetite to own software.
  • The vendor already handles annual limits, new SECURE 2.0 rules and Form 5500 changes.
  • You can live with the vendor's roadmap and hosting model.

When building pays off

  • Your process is a competitive advantage, such as a service model, fee structure or reporting your clients value.
  • Data is re-keyed between testing, forms, billing and the ledger, and the hours add up every year-end.
  • No product connects to your payroll providers, recordkeepers or custodians the way you need.
  • You need control over where participant data is hosted.
  • You are building a product to sell, as a fintech or a recordkeeper.

The hybrid most firms choose

Keep a proven core for testing or recordkeeping, and build the pieces around it that the product does not do well: data intake and validation, integrations, owner dashboards, billing and sponsor portals. This removes most re-keying without taking on the whole rule book.

Costs people forget

  • Annual rule updates. IRS limits change every autumn; new law adds rules over several years, as SECURE 2.0 has.
  • Year-end support. Testing and filing seasons need software and people available.
  • Calculation testing. A regression suite of worked examples has to be kept up to date.
  • Security reviews. Clients and auditors will ask how participant data is protected.
  • Data migration. Moving plans in or out of any system needs reconciled balances.

Side by side

BuyBuildHybrid
Time to first useFastestSlowestFast for the core, then incremental
Fit to your processYou adapt to the productExactExact where it matters
Rule updatesVendorYou or your developerMostly vendor
Data hosting controlVendor's modelYoursMixed
Re-keying between toolsOften remainsRemovedMostly removed

For independent TPAs there is also a middle path we built ourselves: KinetiPlan, a TPA operating system that can be hosted in the TPA's own environment. It is a working pilot build.

Software Home builds custom 401(k) software, so we have an interest in this question. We have tried to set out both sides fairly. See TPA software development or talk to us.

References

  1. IRS: COLA increases for dollar limitations on benefits and contributions
  2. Congress.gov: H.R. 2617, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (includes SECURE 2.0)
  3. US Department of Labor: Form 5500 series
Read next

Related reading

How to choose a 401(k) software development partner

Ten checks and the questions to ask before you hire a team to build retirement plan software.

Read more

Legacy system modernization

Replacing spreadsheets and legacy plan systems with parallel runs and reconciled balances.

Read more

TPA software development

Plan administration systems for US third-party administrators: plan years, census, testing, 5500 data and billing.

Read more
Let's build together

Get Free Quote

For Any Information Call Us Whatsapp info@software-home.net
Contact Software Home
401(k) / TPA solutions

See our work in KinetiPlan

A TPA operating system we built for independent US retirement plan administrators: compliance testing, recordkeeping ledger, payroll intake, projects and billing in one place.